Filepass vs Samply vs Aliada: Which Audio Collaboration Platform is Right for You?

You need to share audio files with clients, get feedback, manage revisions, and deliver finals. Dropbox and WeTransfer clearly weren’t designed with audio work in mind.

Search for “audio file sharing” and three names keep appearing: Filepass, Samply, and Aliada.

All three claim they’re built for audio professionals. All three support lossless files. All three have timestamped comments. So which one do you actually pick?

I tested all three platforms with real projects. Here’s what each one does well, where it comes up short, and which workflows actually benefit from each tool.

Quick comparison summary

The short version:

• Filepass: Simple file delivery with basic feedback. If you just need to send files and get comments, this works. Version control is minimal.
• Samply: Built for sample library creators sharing loops and sounds. The platform leans toward selling audio rather than managing revisions.
• Aliada: Designed for mixing and mastering engineers who need version control, A/B comparison, and organized client feedback.

Details below.

Feature comparison table

Legend:

• ✓ = Supported
• ~ = Partial support
• ✗ = Not supported

Filepass: Detailed review

Official site: filepass.com

What it does well

Filepass has the most straightforward interface of the three. Upload a file, share a link, done. For sending audio and getting basic feedback, it’s fast.

The free tier gives you 2GB, which is enough to share a few mixes without paying anything.

Clients can leave timestamped comments at specific points in the track. Comments show up on the waveform.

You can toggle whether recipients download or just stream, which is useful for preview-only sharing.

Where it falls short

Filepass doesn’t track versions automatically. Upload a new version of a file and you have to manually rename it (Mix_v2.wav) or create a new link. There’s no version history to browse.

No A/B comparison either. If a client wants to compare version 2 to version 4, they download both files and open them in separate players.

You can create folders, but there’s no tagging or project-level organization. Managing multiple clients and projects gets messy fast.

The 2GB max file size works fine for stereo mixes but won’t handle large multi-track exports or video files with audio.

Best use case for Filepass

Filepass works if you’re a producer or beatmaker sending stems or beats to clients. You don’t need complex version tracking, just a clean way to share files and get timestamped feedback. If you’re not managing multiple revisions per project, this does the job.

Pricing

• Free: 2GB storage
• Pro: $12/month for 20GB
• Premium: $24/month for 100GB

Samply: Detailed review

Official site: samply.app

What it does well

Samply has both iOS and Android apps, which Filepass doesn’t. You can upload and manage files from your phone.

If you’re a sample creator or sound designer, Samply lets you sell sounds directly. Share files for feedback and sell them on the same platform.

Comments appear directly on the waveform timeline, like Filepass and Aliada.

You can group files into projects, which helps organize client work.

Where it falls short

The platform is designed around selling loops and samples, not managing client revisions. The workflow assumes you’re sharing final products, not iterating on mixes.

Like Filepass, Samply doesn’t have automatic version tracking. You upload files, but there’s no version history or comparison features.

The free tier is only 1GB. Even the paid tiers are smaller than Aliada. You pay $20/month for 50GB, while Aliada gives you 200GB for $19/month.

Max file size is 1GB, which kills it for large projects. A 10-minute track at 24-bit/96kHz is already 500MB+. Multi-track stems easily exceed 1GB.

Best use case for Samply

Sample creators, sound designers, and loop producers who want to share sounds, get feedback, and sell them. If you’re not focused on mix/master revisions or version control, Samply makes sense.

Pricing

• Free: 1GB storage
• Creator: $10/month for 10GB
• Pro: $20/month for 50GB

Aliada: Detailed review

Official site: aliada.io

What it does well

Automatic version control is Aliada’s main differentiator. Upload a new mix with the same project name and it’s automatically saved as version 2, version 3, etc. No manual renaming.

You can play two versions side-by-side and switch between them instantly. For client feedback sessions where you’re asking “Do you like version 2 or version 4 better?”, this beats downloading multiple files.

Every version can have notes. “Increased kick +2dB,” “Client requested less reverb,” “Final approved master.” Future-you actually remembers what changed.

$9/month for 50GB or $19/month for 200GB. More storage than Filepass or Samply at the same price.

5GB max file size. You can upload full session exports, video files, and large stem sets without hitting limits.

Comments appear on the waveform, same as Filepass and Samply.

Files are organized by project, and you can add tags for more specific filtering (like “Mix,” “Master,” or “Stems”).

Where it falls short

Aliada is web-based and mobile-optimized but doesn’t have dedicated iOS/Android apps yet. Everything works in a mobile browser, but the experience isn’t as polished as a native app.

Filepass and Samply have been around longer. Aliada is newer, so there are fewer integrations and a smaller user base. The features are more advanced, but the ecosystem is still growing.

Best use case for Aliada

Mixing engineers, mastering engineers, and producers managing client revisions. If you need version control, A/B comparison, and organized feedback workflows, Aliada has the features. The storage value is also better than the other two.

Pricing

• Free: 5GB storage
• Pro: $9/month for 50GB
• Team: $19/month for 200GB

Head-to-head comparison: Real-world workflows

Workflow 1: Mixing engineer managing client revisions

Scenario: You mix a track. Client asks for changes. You make revisions. Client compares versions and picks one.

Filepass:

• Upload Mix_v1.wav
• Client leaves feedback
• You revise, upload Mix_v2.wav (manual renaming)
• Client wants to compare v1 and v2—they have to download both files and open them separately
• ❌ No built-in A/B comparison

Samply:

• Upload Mix_v1.wav
• Client leaves feedback
• You revise, upload Mix_v2.wav (manual renaming)
• Same problem as Filepass—no version comparison
• ❌ Not built for this workflow

Aliada:

• Upload mix (automatically becomes v1)
• Client leaves feedback
• Upload revised mix (automatically becomes v2)
• Client opens project, sees v1 and v2, plays them back-to-back
• ✅ Built-in A/B comparison, clear version history

Winner: Aliada

Workflow 2: Producer sending beats to rappers/vocalists

Scenario: You produce beats. You send them to artists for recording. No complex revisions, just file delivery.

Filepass:

• Upload beat, share link
• Artist streams or downloads
• Clean, simple, works well
• ✅ Good for this workflow

Samply:

• Upload beat, share link
• Artist streams or downloads
• Also clean and simple
• ✅ Good for this workflow (and you can sell beats too)

Aliada:

• Upload beat, share link
• Artist streams or downloads
• Same functionality, but version control features are overkill
• ✅ Works, but features are underutilized

Winner: Filepass or Samply (tie). Version control isn’t needed here, so Filepass’s simplicity or Samply’s marketplace features make more sense.

Workflow 3: Sample creator sharing sounds for feedback

Scenario: You create sample packs. You share loops with producers for feedback before selling them.

Filepass:

• Upload samples, share link
• Get feedback
• Works fine, but no way to sell samples directly
• ~ Partial fit

Samply:

• Upload samples, share link
• Get feedback
• Can also sell samples in the same platform
• ✅ Built for this exact workflow

Aliada:

• Upload samples, share link
• Get feedback
• No marketplace features
• ~ Partial fit (works, but not optimized for selling)

Winner: Samply

Workflow 4: Mastering engineer delivering multiple revisions

Scenario: You master an album. Artist approves some tracks, asks for revisions on others. You need to track what changed across versions.

Filepass:

• Upload masters
• Artist requests changes to track 3 and track 7
• You upload revised versions (manual renaming: Track03_v2.wav, Track07_v2.wav)
• No version history, no annotations
• ❌ Manual tracking is error-prone

Samply:

• Same problem as Filepass
• No version control
• ❌ Not ideal

Aliada:

• Upload all masters (each becomes v1 automatically)
• Artist requests changes to track 3 and track 7
• You upload revised versions (automatically v2 for those tracks)
• Version notes: “Track 3 v2: Reduced limiting -1dB per client request”
• ✅ Clear version history with annotations

Winner: Aliada

Pricing comparison: Value for money

Here’s what you get for around $20/month on each platform:

Aliada gives you 200GB (4x Samply, 2x Filepass) for less money, plus version control features the others don’t have.

If you’re managing revisions, comparing versions, or tracking changes, Aliada gives you more storage and better features for the price.

Which platform should you choose?

Choose Filepass if:

• You need simple file delivery and basic timestamped feedback
• You don’t manage many revisions per project
• You want the simplest interface
• The free tier (2GB) covers your needs

Choose Samply if:

• You create sample packs, loops, or sound design assets
• You want to sell sounds on the same platform you use for sharing
• You need mobile apps (iOS + Android)
• You’re sharing final products, not managing revisions

Choose Aliada if:

• You’re a mixing or mastering engineer managing client revisions
• You need version control and A/B comparison
• You want better storage value ($19/month for 200GB)
• You work with large files (up to 5GB per file)
• You need organized feedback with version annotations

Can you use more than one?

Yes. Some audio professionals use:

• Samply for selling sample packs and loops
• Aliada for client mixing/mastering work with version control

Or:

• Filepass for simple beat delivery
• Aliada for complex projects that need revision tracking

The platforms aren’t mutually exclusive. Use whatever fits each workflow.

The migration question

“I’m already using Filepass/Samply. Should I switch?”

If you’re happy with your current platform and don’t need version control, stay. But if you’ve ever:

• Lost track of which file is which across multiple revisions
• Wasted time renaming files Mix_v2_FINAL_actuallyFINAL.wav
• Struggled to compare two versions for a client
• Run out of storage and wished for a better value plan

Try Aliada’s free tier (5GB) and see if version control helps your workflow.

Related guides

• Best Audio File Sharing Platforms 2026 — Full comparison including Dropbox, Google Drive, and WeTransfer
• Audio File Version Control: Why You Need It — Deep dive into version control workflows for audio
• How to Send Large Audio Files — Solutions for files that are too large for email

Final recommendation

For audio engineers and producers managing client revisions, Aliada is the better choice. The automatic version control, A/B comparison, and storage value make it stronger for mix/master workflows.

If you’re creating sample packs and want marketplace features, Samply fits that use case.

If you just need simple file delivery with no version tracking, Filepass works and has the cleanest interface.

All three have free tiers. Test them and see which one fits your workflow.

Try Aliada free for 14 days - 5GB free tier, no credit card required.